Исходник Detect missed shots type ( spread, occlusion, prediction error, unknown, etc )

[ShalexState]

if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_SPREAD ) ) {
    if ( !g_aim->can_hit( target, aim_matrix, hitgroup, 0.f ) && !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to spread", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_BAD_RESOLVE ) ) {
    ++g_aim->missed_shots[ target->get_index( ) ];
    if ( g_cfg->rage_bot.anti_aim_correction
        && abs( target->get_sim_time( ) - target->get_old_sim_time( ) ) > 0
        && g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to bad resolve", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_OCCLUSION ) ) {
    auto dmg1 = g_autowall->get_dmg( g_globals->get_eye_pos );
    auto dmg2 = g_autowall->get_dmg( g_aim->get_aim_pos );
 
    // not proper method lol.
    if ( fabs( dmg1 - dmg2 ) < 100 )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to occlusion", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_PREDICTION_ERROR ) ) {
    if ( g_engine_prediction->has_have_prediction_error && !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to prediction error", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
     
    // repredict after prediction error.
    g_prediction->re_predict( );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_UNKOWN ) ) {
    if ( !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to unkown", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}

 

[sove]

я так понимаю твой чит не брутит / репредиктит, если логи выключены?

 

[ReturnAddr]

if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_SPREAD ) ) {
    if ( !g_aim->can_hit( target, aim_matrix, hitgroup, 0.f ) && !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to spread", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_BAD_RESOLVE ) ) {
    ++g_aim->missed_shots[ target->get_index( ) ];
    if ( g_cfg->rage_bot.anti_aim_correction
        && abs( target->get_sim_time( ) - target->get_old_sim_time( ) ) > 0
        && g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to bad resolve", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_OCCLUSION ) ) {
    auto dmg1 = g_autowall->get_dmg( g_globals->get_eye_pos );
    auto dmg2 = g_autowall->get_dmg( g_aim->get_aim_pos );

    // not proper method lol.
    if ( fabs( dmg1 - dmg2 ) < 100 )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to occlusion", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_PREDICTION_ERROR ) ) {
    if ( g_engine_prediction->has_have_prediction_error && !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to prediction error", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
    
    // repredict after prediction error.
    g_prediction->re_predict( );
}
else if ( g_logs->get_logs.at( MISSED_SHOT_DUE_TO_UNKOWN ) ) {
    if ( !g_shot->player_hit_impact )
        g_logs->push_log( "missed shot due to unkown", col_t( 255, 255, 255, 255 ) );
}

all wrong code bruh...

 

[bobbyshmurda]

great, a shitpile of

if

and

else if

statements.

 

[aethstetic1337]

how does one has_have a prediction error ?

 

[fidachyo]

я так понимаю твой чит не брутит / репредиктит, если логи выключены?

у димы нет чита, он привык писать рандомный код с разными кодстайлами, потому что у него беды с башкой и он думает что написал супер функу для своего чита

 

[peen]

paster looking for reactions?

 

[crystalllll]

свич для лохов

 

[susundercover]

great, a shitpile of

if

and

else if

statements.

how would you apply a case switch here???

 

[AmpujaKid]

how would you apply a case switch here???

if youre smart , the enums elements will be declared as integers , so its not difficult

switch (g_ResolverData->gResolveMethod) {
    case RESOLVE_STAND:
        info << "( method : [ stand ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_AIR:
        info << "( method : [ air ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_WALK:
         info << "( method : [ walk ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_EDGE:
         info << "( method : [ antifreestanding ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_PRED:
         info << "( method : [ last moving ] | ";
         break;
    default:
         info << "( method : [ none ] | ";
         break;
}

edit : added slightly longer pseudo code instead of the five line pseudo i had before

 

[ValveBAN88]

how does one has_have a prediction error ?

Due to server, some servers are kinda stinky and u may miss due to that

 

[susundercover]

if youre smart , the enums elements will be declared as integers , so its not difficult

switch (g_ResolverData->gResolveMethod) {
    case RESOLVE_STAND:
        info << "( method : [ stand ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_AIR:
        info << "( method : [ air ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_WALK:
         info << "( method : [ walk ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_EDGE:
         info << "( method : [ antifreestanding ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_PRED:
         info << "( method : [ last moving ] | ";
         break;
    default:
         info << "( method : [ none ] | ";
         break;
}

edit : added slightly longer pseudo code instead of the five line pseudo i had before

didn't think of that, neat
edit: that still doesn't solve the issue, the op doesn't do any checks for resolve methods which could be handled that way.

 

[peen]

if youre smart , the enums elements will be declared as integers , so its not difficult

switch (g_ResolverData->gResolveMethod) {
    case RESOLVE_STAND:
        info << "( method : [ stand ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_AIR:
        info << "( method : [ air ] | ";
        break;
    case RESOLVE_WALK:
         info << "( method : [ walk ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_EDGE:
         info << "( method : [ antifreestanding ] | ";
         break;
    case RESOLVE_PRED:
         info << "( method : [ last moving ] | ";
         break;
    default:
         info << "( method : [ none ] | ";
         break;
}

edit : added slightly longer pseudo code instead of the five line pseudo i had before

please dont post your supremacy related stuff here lets these monkies figure it out on their own please

 

[AmpujaKid]

please dont post your supremacy related stuff here lets these monkies figure it out on their own please

it isnt supremacy but okay

didn't think of that, neat
edit: that still doesn't solve the issue, the op doesn't do any checks for resolve methods which could be handled that way.

at the beginning of your resolver function
g_ResolverData->gResolveMethod = RESOLVE_METHOD;