Thigh destr0yer
-
Автор темы
- #1
virtualized code and another funny trick ;)
lmk what i can do differently
lmk what i can do differently
Вложения
-
920.7 KB Просмотры: 52
wow interestingvirtualized code and another funny trick ;)
there is no string encryption (it isnt a string...,) patching is boring, try again.Bad string encryption,lul(2 minutes for patch(rva:6093F))
Посмотреть вложение 223845
Вместо чая перед школой пропатчил хпхпххпinstead of tea before school
You have too many allusions to this post.you guys only know how to patch a single asm instruction, you are supposed to get the password, thats the point of this crackme, you arent trying to get the end message.... facepalm x10000
Who cares about your virtualized code , if for patch your crackme need one minute x1000you guys only know how to patch a single asm instruction, you are supposed to get the password, thats the point of this crackme, you arent trying to get the end message.... facepalm x10000
the point of this isnt to patch it, like i said, get the password or you failed.Who cares about your virtualized code , if for patch your crackme need one minute x1000
You can't get a password in your fucking crackme man , cuz its not interestingthe point of this isnt to patch it, like i said, get the password or you failed.
you didn't even mention that guys need to get password. and in real life no one will try to find it, they will use the simplest way of cracking the software.the point of this isnt to patch it, like i said, get the password or you failed.
the point of this isnt to patch it, like i said, get the password or you failed.
std::string pass = password;
int xor_key = -2128831035;
int mul = 16777619;
int result = 0;
for(std::size_t i{0} ; i < pass.size ( ) ; ++i)
{
result = (password[i] ^ xor_key) * mul;
xor_key = result;
}
if(result == -626372842)
gg;
else
fuck u;
fnv hash and he wants us to find password XDD what a jokesteel allow yourself a lot for algo in 2 linesC++:std::string pass = password; int xor_key = -2128831035; int mul = 16777619; int result = 0; for(std::size_t i{0} ; i < pass.size ( ) ; ++i) { result = (password[i] ^ xor_key) * mul; xor_key = result; } if(result == -626372842) gg; else fuck u;
This is getting kind of a funny discussion, so I'll say an important point:the point of this isnt to patch it, like i said, get the password or you failed.
?????????Посмотреть вложение 224181
Your fucking result not completely divided man , thats enough to understand what u are idiot
read what i said before, it isnt a string, there is no xoring.... why are you xoring it?steel allow yourself a lot for algo in 2 linesC++:std::string pass = password; int xor_key = -2128831035; int mul = 16777619; int result = 0; for(std::size_t i{0} ; i < pass.size ( ) ; ++i) { result = (password[i] ^ xor_key) * mul; xor_key = result; } if(result == -626372842) gg; else fuck u;
i wrote it in 2 minutes, im sorry you are all so smooth brained, i literally said 4 times you need to find the password, idk why you all think patching is the only form of cracking... what happens when they update it and fix the patches but the password is still the same? then what are you gonna do...you didn't even mention that guys need to get password. and in real life no one will try to find it, they will use the simplest way of cracking the software.
what about improving security so ppl won't be able to crack it with 1 patch?
you are all retarded, there is no checks, why are you flexing that you can patch a function, its literally 1 asm instruction.... you are completely missing the point of this, COMPLETELY, stop it bruh.
?????????
read what i said before, it isnt a string, there is no xoring.... why are you xoring it?
i wrote it in 2 minutes, im sorry you are all so smooth brained, i literally said 4 times you need to find the password, idk why you all think patching is the only form of cracking... what happens when they update it and fix the patches but the password is still the same? then what are you gonna do...
a sick piece of shit on your head, they answered you yesterday that they were not going to look for a password from your shit, it's not interesting to anyone, admit that you fucked up even more when you were thrown off the disassembled algorithm and the result of division, which will never be wholeyou are all retarded, there is no checks, why are you flexing that you can patch a function, its literally 1 asm instruction.... you are completely missing the point of this, COMPLETELY, stop it bruh.
?????????
read what i said before, it isnt a string, there is no xoring.... why are you xoring it?
i wrote it in 2 minutes, im sorry you are all so smooth brained, i literally said 4 times you need to find the password, idk why you all think patching is the only form of cracking... what happens when they update it and fix the patches but the password is still the same? then what are you gonna do...
Проект предоставляет различный материал, относящийся к сфере киберспорта, программирования, ПО для игр, а также позволяет его участникам общаться на многие другие темы. Почта для жалоб: admin@yougame.biz